hara_patta_for_rico
07-17 01:47 PM
There is an on AILA titled...Update (Such As It Is) on the Visa Bulletin Debacle (Updated 2pm)
Does anyone know what it is about?
Does anyone know what it is about?
wallpaper Drama Desk Awards 2011
jasmin45
07-26 08:44 PM
Why don't you extend with current employer A? That is the best option right?
ksairi
07-31 10:21 PM
http://lofgren.house.gov/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=1819
July 30, 2007
Washington, D.C. � Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) today introduced a bill to void the recent increases in immigration fees by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The bill would void the new fee structure set to take effect today and reinstate the previous fee structure. The bill also states that USCIS has consistently failed to reduce application backlogs and has suffered from a lack of transparency and effective management.
�Our immigration services need to move into the 21st century,� stated Rep. Zoe Lofgren. �But, USCIS has consistently failed to explain or justify the amounts and distributions of this new fee increase. While I agree that USCIS needs to modernize its existing infrastructure and procedures, they must do so in a transparent and open manner. After repeated requests over several months, USCIS has yet to provide Congress with a detailed plan for its infrastructure modernization efforts. Our immigration system should be both effective and fair; sacrificing one to achieve the other should not be an option.�
Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren is serving her seventh term in Congress representing most of the City of San Jose and Santa Clara County. She serves as Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law. She also Chairs the House Administration Subcommittee on Elections and serves on the House Homeland Security Committee. Congresswoman Lofgren is Chair of the California Democratic Congressional Delegation consisting of 34 Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives from California.
July 30, 2007
Washington, D.C. � Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) today introduced a bill to void the recent increases in immigration fees by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The bill would void the new fee structure set to take effect today and reinstate the previous fee structure. The bill also states that USCIS has consistently failed to reduce application backlogs and has suffered from a lack of transparency and effective management.
�Our immigration services need to move into the 21st century,� stated Rep. Zoe Lofgren. �But, USCIS has consistently failed to explain or justify the amounts and distributions of this new fee increase. While I agree that USCIS needs to modernize its existing infrastructure and procedures, they must do so in a transparent and open manner. After repeated requests over several months, USCIS has yet to provide Congress with a detailed plan for its infrastructure modernization efforts. Our immigration system should be both effective and fair; sacrificing one to achieve the other should not be an option.�
Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren is serving her seventh term in Congress representing most of the City of San Jose and Santa Clara County. She serves as Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law. She also Chairs the House Administration Subcommittee on Elections and serves on the House Homeland Security Committee. Congresswoman Lofgren is Chair of the California Democratic Congressional Delegation consisting of 34 Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives from California.
2011 Daniel Radcliffe Missing Harry Potter#39;s Magic at the 2011 Tony Awards
gc03
05-12 08:05 AM
The passage of the CIR in the Senate is reportedly almost assured. The question remains how much change we will see in the Senate's final bill. One of the agreements which the leaders of Republican and Democrat Senators reached as part of the deal involves the procedural matter that will allow "amendments" on the floor to the CIR proposal which the Senate almost passed when the Senators left for the Easter break in April, 2006. It is thus likely that there may be introduced a flurry of amendments on the floor and a fierce battle on these amendments. Accordingly, the liberal version of the Senate proposal may be substantially compromised before it is enacted into a law this year. We will see the first compromise in the Senate this month before the Senate passes its bill. The second compromise will take place during the Senate-House Conference Committee proceeding after May 2006. It is thus almost certain that the current CIR proposal in the Senate may be substantially toned down and compromised to accomodate the hawkish conservative Senators and members of the House.
Considering the fact that the Senate will procedurally open opportunities for the Senators to introduce amendments on the floor beginning from next week, this may be the last chance for the pro and con lobbysts to make their voices heard and reflected in the Senate's final bill. Such opportunity will include both legal and illegal immigration legislation in the CIR packet.
May be it's time for us(IV) to lobby Senators to incorporate IV Goals into Final CIR bill!
Considering the fact that the Senate will procedurally open opportunities for the Senators to introduce amendments on the floor beginning from next week, this may be the last chance for the pro and con lobbysts to make their voices heard and reflected in the Senate's final bill. Such opportunity will include both legal and illegal immigration legislation in the CIR packet.
May be it's time for us(IV) to lobby Senators to incorporate IV Goals into Final CIR bill!
more...
americandesi
08-29 01:49 PM
There is nothing called "H1b transfer" basically every company applies new H1b but it is within quota and you can have multiple companies holding your h1b visa but you can work only for one company on full time rest part time and there is no need cancel H1b, just go and join the company you want to join. Hope this helps
To work part time, the labor petition for the part time employer should reflect PART TIME hours. You can't have FULL TIME hours on labor and work PART TIME.
To work part time, the labor petition for the part time employer should reflect PART TIME hours. You can't have FULL TIME hours on labor and work PART TIME.
ragz4u
05-09 09:46 AM
And we might be in the final edited version (very good chance) for a few minutes
more...
prem_goel
05-04 05:50 PM
If you show proof you are planning to go back to India if he terminates you, then the employer most likely will ask you to book the ticket and will refund the amount after you show him the ticket receipt.
2010 Audience awards
determined_indian
02-14 06:03 AM
I am in the same boat (will be filing for extension within a month)...
Just interpreting the amendment as it is - looks like this applies only to new hires...
Link to article from a leading immigration law firm
http://pubweb.fdbl.com/news1.nsf/9abe5d703b986cff86256e310080943a/9305d862a955b30a8525755c0058f9d0?OpenDocument
What is in the Bill?
"
(1) IN GENERAL.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it shall be unlawful for any recipient of funding under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-343) or section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 342 et seq.) to hire any nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(h)(i)(b)) unless the recipient is in compliance with the requirements for an H-1B dependent employer (as defined in section 212(n)(3) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(n)(3))), except that the second sentence of section 212(n)(1)(E)(ii) of such Act shall not apply.
(2) DEFINED TERM.--In this subsection, the term ``hire'' means to permit a new employee to commence a period of employment"
Common sense interpretation would be - if TARP recipient is looking to hire (new employee) a non-immigrant they have comply with H1B Dependant employer rules.
However, it is upto USCIS & DOL on how to interpret and implement it as a law. If they classify any TARP recepient to be "H1B Dependent" and if they consider H1B extensions as new hire (which is an expansive interpretation), then our extension might have an impact.
Just interpreting the amendment as it is - looks like this applies only to new hires...
Link to article from a leading immigration law firm
http://pubweb.fdbl.com/news1.nsf/9abe5d703b986cff86256e310080943a/9305d862a955b30a8525755c0058f9d0?OpenDocument
What is in the Bill?
"
(1) IN GENERAL.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it shall be unlawful for any recipient of funding under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-343) or section 13 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 342 et seq.) to hire any nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(h)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(h)(i)(b)) unless the recipient is in compliance with the requirements for an H-1B dependent employer (as defined in section 212(n)(3) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(n)(3))), except that the second sentence of section 212(n)(1)(E)(ii) of such Act shall not apply.
(2) DEFINED TERM.--In this subsection, the term ``hire'' means to permit a new employee to commence a period of employment"
Common sense interpretation would be - if TARP recipient is looking to hire (new employee) a non-immigrant they have comply with H1B Dependant employer rules.
However, it is upto USCIS & DOL on how to interpret and implement it as a law. If they classify any TARP recepient to be "H1B Dependent" and if they consider H1B extensions as new hire (which is an expansive interpretation), then our extension might have an impact.
more...
REEF�
05-10 04:24 PM
:lol: Good job!
hair Então, agora que chegamos
sts_seeker
06-14 06:41 PM
Does the first I-140 denial has any impact on the second I-140 I am filing?IF so how is that???
more...
Dhundhun
04-05 02:32 AM
As such, there is no grace period and it starts counting towards unauthorized stay (US is somewhat liberal for unauthorized stay for up to 180 days). It should be fine getting H1B transferred ASAP.
After 180 day, reentry can be banned for three years. After 1 years reentry can be banned for 10 years.
After 180 day, reentry can be banned for three years. After 1 years reentry can be banned for 10 years.
hot Daniel Radcliffe - 12th Annual Broadway.com Audience Choice Awards
number30
08-23 07:26 PM
Hi
I am currently on H1b and I have applied for an extension around July 14th. My i-94 is expiring on
Sept 20th. My husband is currently on F-1. I wanted to find out in case my H1b visa is rejected, will
I have to immediately leave the country. Would it be possible for me to convert to F-2 while being in US
in case my H1-B gets rejected?
Convert H1 into Premium. You need to get the results before Sept-20. So that you can apply for F2 visa.
I am currently on H1b and I have applied for an extension around July 14th. My i-94 is expiring on
Sept 20th. My husband is currently on F-1. I wanted to find out in case my H1b visa is rejected, will
I have to immediately leave the country. Would it be possible for me to convert to F-2 while being in US
in case my H1-B gets rejected?
Convert H1 into Premium. You need to get the results before Sept-20. So that you can apply for F2 visa.
more...
house MTV Movie Awards, Dan was
DallasBlue
09-15 12:37 AM
am loving it !!
tattoo 2011: Drama League Awards
mrsr
06-25 05:19 PM
is 1 company allowed to file 2 i140 for same individual ?
hi guys this is urgent plzzzzzz help
i am a pharmacist recently licensed in florida and i found 2003 approved labor but my lawyer is telling me that in order to substitute it for me i must be licensed in florida at the time of filling date of this approved labor which is in 2003.
thanks in advance
hi guys this is urgent plzzzzzz help
i am a pharmacist recently licensed in florida and i found 2003 approved labor but my lawyer is telling me that in order to substitute it for me i must be licensed in florida at the time of filling date of this approved labor which is in 2003.
thanks in advance
more...
pictures DanielRadcliffeTonys.jpg
sbmallik
06-30 01:19 PM
In that situation, your wife can re-enter using the H-4 stamp.
dresses Daniel Radcliffe in New Harry
akhilmahajan
10-03 12:46 PM
Hello All,
I have applied for my 485 in July 2007 and I have received receipt notice for 485 application as well. I also got the appointmnet for FP. I moved to a new location and address has chaged now. If I update my address in USCIS, What are the consequences?
I still have access to the mail in my old address as my friend lives there.
Please suggest.
Thanks!!
Changing of address seems to be a simple procedure, but it is very inconsistent and arduous.
Please follow this thread.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13833
I hope this helps.
I have applied for my 485 in July 2007 and I have received receipt notice for 485 application as well. I also got the appointmnet for FP. I moved to a new location and address has chaged now. If I update my address in USCIS, What are the consequences?
I still have access to the mail in my old address as my friend lives there.
Please suggest.
Thanks!!
Changing of address seems to be a simple procedure, but it is very inconsistent and arduous.
Please follow this thread.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13833
I hope this helps.
more...
makeup Video: Daniel Radcliffe Shows
gccovet
06-18 12:35 PM
Wondering if we need to Pay $80 towards Biometric Fee when Renewing I-131? paid the Biometric Fee last year when Applied for the First Time.
No biometric fees for renewals.
GCCovet
No biometric fees for renewals.
GCCovet
girlfriend Daniel Radcliffe arrives
jonty_11
07-27 10:37 AM
if there was something IV core would have informed us and suggested action items..
as of now concentrate on 2 action items
- Sending Thankyou cards
- Upload IV video on utube
as of now concentrate on 2 action items
- Sending Thankyou cards
- Upload IV video on utube
hairstyles Daniel Radcliffe
yabadaba
03-28 05:42 AM
Feinsteins ammendment
http://feinstein.senate.gov/06releases/r-agworker327.htm
"To avoid backlogs, aliens who receive a green card under this program will be exempt from the overall numerical limitations on visas (i.e., 675,000 visas) and the country numerical limitations for Mexico, India, China and the Philippines"
so does it mean if ur an agri worker a visa will be available to u? and if ur a professional u have the same retrogression cap??????
what what I can make of this all un used numbers trickle down to theunskilled workers, so if the visa numbers are current for them with caps of 290,000. Indian and Chinese EB2 workers will still be retrogressed whilethese guys are current
http://feinstein.senate.gov/06releases/r-agworker327.htm
"To avoid backlogs, aliens who receive a green card under this program will be exempt from the overall numerical limitations on visas (i.e., 675,000 visas) and the country numerical limitations for Mexico, India, China and the Philippines"
so does it mean if ur an agri worker a visa will be available to u? and if ur a professional u have the same retrogression cap??????
what what I can make of this all un used numbers trickle down to theunskilled workers, so if the visa numbers are current for them with caps of 290,000. Indian and Chinese EB2 workers will still be retrogressed whilethese guys are current
martinvisalaw
08-12 02:02 PM
First, the letter you got is probably a standard local office interview letter, so that it assumes a marriage-based interview rather than employment-based. This happens often.
You should have an AC21 letter with you for the interview, to show that you continue to be eligible to adjust status.
You should have an AC21 letter with you for the interview, to show that you continue to be eligible to adjust status.
mpadapa
09-07 03:19 PM
vandanaverdia - thanks for attending the rally. U folks R a great motivation for others. Do touch base with "WeShallOvercome" and start some WA chapter activities.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento